Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Surfing the wave

An year ago, I was inconsistent about two things. The first is that I said you shouldn't stay on top. Instead, go back to reality. Then I said that you should go back to reality really fast and start your new dream. But since life is a single continuous curve, I'm not sure the peak is the dream and the valley is reality. Instead, we are not limited to one curve (and we don't even need the third axis yet. We can consider each curve (in the same 2D) a different facet of life. And we can consider Y-axis being a measurement of quality, and the X-axis being time.

So, instead of increasing frequency (in order to be in a "Dream" life), I would tell you to switch between your life facets, through time, being always on top, and enjoy the max quality. If you have a big amount of different life facets (or we could consider different dreams, maybe), you can be on top forever :)

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Micro Dreams

Each peak in a cycle can be reasonably called a Dream. Since life is analog, we must go through our lives from zero to infinite to zero and so on, through our life.

If your life is boring, you're not dreaming enough (in quantity). So, after you define your peaks, don't try to stay in these peaks as much as possible. Instead, go back to Reality very fast (where the curve touches x-axis) and start your new dream, as fast as possible.

Now I wonder if there is a z-axis, and what would it mean.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Measurements

So, is it a question of measuring the size of a cycle, which means the period? Improve your amplitude and consider your period tending to zero!

Monday, July 9, 2007

Cycles and measurements

Before starting this post, I was wondering why I simply can't start posting. If I could consider each day in my life with a small objective, I would write in a daily basis, writing my achievements or failures. But then I realized that it is against my new theory.

We divide our lives in cycles. We do it to measure our performance related to some abstract reference. It is as obvious as yellow is yellow, ok. But, the fact is that the only real reference is our death. And, as we don't know when exactly we will die, we can get lost in our life. Then we create cycles.

Alright, but I think I finally got it. If we understand life as a continuous path and we learn to enjoy the path, it is solved. But all Buddhists already knew it. So what is different?

Nah... no conclusion.. I'll not write yet.

Monday, June 18, 2007

About the creation

If you admit there is a beginning, you're assuming there is an end.